Manual Testing and Automation Testing can work Hand-in-hand
Is automation testing a threatening death knell for manual testing? Will automated testing outdo manual testing, hence putting an end to the on-going battle between automated and manual testing? Is manual testing not worth the effort? Is manual testing gradually dying paving way for the nearly robotic automated testing?
Such questions have been bothering manual testers who inconsistently feel insecure in the apparent vague of automated testing. However, these questions are simultaneously deemed unnecessary by the renowned IT Industry experts who believe that the “VS” battle between the two should be shunned in favour of both manual and automated testing working in full collaboration, working hand-in-hand.
Why “VS”? Opt for “and”..
It is indeed intriguing to see even the smartest resources being engaged in the “VS” battle. The IT world is largely polarized into two camps: the first camp is overwhelmed by the distinctive excellence of the automated testing, therefore declaring exploratory manual testing as largely childish; while the second loathes automation for the tremendous fear of annihilation that it has brought along with it for human testers and manual testing. However, the key concern remains, why settle for either/or? Both manual testing and automated testing have certain pros and cons. Having taken this aspect into consideration, it is advisable if one makes use of all the pros of both manual and automated testing.
Manual Testing – A Brilliant Human Brain at work
Wonders happen when human brain is at work. Only a human can create workable test designs, foresee defects, and execute designs to perfection. A manual tester can foresee other failures which sometimes go unnoticed during automation testing. Further, a manual tester can alter the flows or change the code to ensure that the program expectations meet the actual outcomes. This is an obvious benefit, since the manual tester can be extra insightful while carrying out exploratory testing to the best of his abilities.
Automated Testing – Making things easier, faster, and accurate
There is no denying of the fact that automated testing has proved beneficial for the QA community, since the QA engineers are now relieved from the burden of continuous regression tests. An automated testing tool does it all – it executes the test design, finds out software bugs, compares the outcome to the expected behaviour, and communicates the accuracy of manual tests to a test engineer. Automated testing is definitely an accurate way of uncovering bugs in relatively lesser time, at a quicker pace, and with the help of only a few resources.
The Collaboration between the Two – A Remarkable Solution!
Large Projects: Automated, Small Projects: Manual
Why opt for expensive software automation tools for a short-term project? Automation tools are expensive but they are worth buying if the project is large and involves multiple data driven tests or multi-browser tests. In such cases automation testing is highly beneficial, fast, reliable, and even cost-effective. Whereas for short-term projects, manual testing is ideal since it cuts project cost to a minimum which otherwise shoots up to the sky if one opts for automated testing which requires automation testers, frameworks, and tools.
Reusing Tests: A Boon in Automated Testing
Manual tests can’t be reused. One alteration in the software and you will have to run the test again, putting in all the efforts and filling in all the information once again, resulting in overall wastage of time and human effort. However, in such a scenario, automated testing comes as a rescue because one can reuse and rerun tests, hence alleviating the fear of continuous regressions on the ever-changing code.
Automated Testing is Automated!
Automated Testing is automated and hence robotic. Automated testing is just a set of pre-recorded and pre-defined actions that have been primarily designed by a human. Therefore, automated testing executes what you want it to execute. It lacks a human insight that can look into potential software bugs which a manual tester never fails to find out. A manual tester is able to foresee defects and bugs that would appear when a real user handles the program. He can therefore, immediately translate his observation and ideas into something concrete, and can henceforth, change the course of the project for better. This remains the main reason why QA community still believes in human intervention even if automated testing offers some remarkable benefits.
Not all the Tasks can be Tested Manually
Testing such as Low Level Interface Regression cannot be done manually. In such cases, manual testing will only lead to more errors and mistakes. Cases in which manual testing fails to provide any worthwhile solution, QA engineers must not think twice to use automated testing. Automated testing will certainly reduce the possibility of errors to a minimum and will also ensure faster execution of the code.
Automated Testing improves Manual Testing
It is certain that manual testing and automated testing can go hand-in-hand. Neither of the two can replace the other in entirety. Instead both manual and automated testing complement each other to perfection. A testing professional or a testing team making use of positive aspects of both the ways can always achieve better and reliable results, instead of those relying stubbornly upon either of these two. What is required is the whole hearted acceptance of both the manual and automated testing, instead of having a biased perception towards them, and instead of polarising the IT world into two camps: Pro-Automated Testing and Pro-Manual Testing.
We, at ETLhive, are aware of the benefits of both manual and automated testing and this is the reason why we have designed two distinct and comprehensive courses on Software Testing and on Advanced Selenium (Automated Testing). The course in Software Testing at ETLhive offers the best training that will help you master the fundamental concepts in software testing: the software testing processes, manual testing and automation testing, risk management and defect management; and the Advanced Selenium Course will throw light on other significant topics such as Automation testing and its Existence, Selenium and its Background, Industry Acceptance and Recognition in Indian IT Industry, Niche of Selenium, Selenium IDE, JAVA for Webdriver, Frameworks in Automation: JUNIT Framework, TestNG Framework, and many more. ETLhive is indeed the best training institute for Selenium and Software Testing wherein you will acquire the best skills to journey out to become successful Software Testing Engineers, Software Test Managers, and even QA Engineers, QA leads and QA Managers